Between Technology and Criminal Justice

I. Introduction As information plays a resilient role in the advancements of distressing justice arrangement, technological changes be tight related to the scoop out conduct of criminal justice. The very efficiency of system evict be integral to the quality of justice it provides. More over, the timely dissemination of information through new technologies too has larger impacts on criminal justice system. At present, technological exploitation has begin more building complex and it has given birth to new types of databases which are qualitatively different.The purpose of this root is to analyze the effects of technological advancements pertaining to the communication capabilities of criminal justice system. It would the merits and demerits of major(ip) databases such as AFIS, Live Scan, Facial Recognition, and Iris Scan short and compares them in their strengths and weaknesses. II. Technology, Database and Criminal Justice Over the years, information engineering science has become a key component of the criminal justice systems as it has unprecedentedly enhanced the communication capabilities of database available for the conduct of criminal justice.Not only the doubtfulness bodies such as police but withal courts and establishments as close making agencies too make use of advances information and communication technologies in their pursuit of criminal justice. Blitz (2004) has argued that the creation of databases for entire population itself is illicit and categorically asserts that it is not merely the continuing observation of activities that undercuts privacy, but to an fifty-fifty greater degree, the ongoing recording of these activities.Importantly, criminals too adjudge been using train technology not only for cyber crimes but also for inflicting severe crimes over several realms of social life. Technologically sophisticated databases such as GPS introduce bracelets, biometric scanners, online offender indexes, and DNA databasesgiv e the government power to control on the hook(predicate) persons without relying on any exertion of physical control (Murphy, 2008). Automated Finger put outs assignment Systems (AFIS) enables the checking of criminal history records of a person just a question of minutes.It has been argues that the ability of AFIS systems to search millions of records in minutes and present candidates to the possible print examiner borders on the incredible (Komarinski, 2005). AFIS is technologically sophisticated mainly in three counts quantity wise-the period of fingerprints could be cross checked, quality wise- the extent of correctness of the information and time wise-the extent of time saving and oppo commit related benefits involved. AFIS can be assistive not only in identifying criminals but also the victims of crime.Following the World Trade Center attack, it is with the help of AFIS, the latent print examiners were able to identify over 300 victims, bringing check and comfort to their families. This would not adopt been possible without AFIS technology (Komarinski, 2005). It is also helpful for identifying deal with memory disorders or who are dead. Moreover, it could be as violent as possible to integrate the entire biometric details of all the people in the world.Also, it is possible to link AFIS systems easily with other databases too. AFIS can also be used in avoiding welfare cheating and the right tryst of government services for the right people. As AFIS systems grow in undischarged speed, a latent print found at crime site could be compared against all the known people and if not matching, could be stored for upcoming match. Iris Scan is highly advanced as which are per perceive to have a higher accuracy rate than traditional facial nerve recognition programs.Also, Iris scan enables the documentation of ones individualism without even his/her identity as it is legal in most countries to snap the image of a person in public. It also could be potentially used for august residency and movement restrictions that declare certain areas off limits to particular individuals who have conditional paroles, barring notices or stay away orders. However, it gives the possibility of the revile of Iris Scan databases for segregating ethnic minorities or other dissident groups.A technology like Live Scan or Iris Scan can be an easy tool for governments and big corporations to breach the privacy of costless individuals and authoritarian regimes could well use them for surveillance of the entire population. Also, such databases and techniques could be hacked by criminal elements and used for terrorizing the whole world. Murphy (2005) has pointed out that government strategies virtual contol could be more dangerous than physical control as still the courts unduly focus on the physical world as the relevant metric against which all restraints are judged.As a result, technologies of restraint are imposed without necessary procedural safe guards. The unaccountability of the possible uses of databases by the governments too is a matter of alarming concern. In other words, a technological development such as Iris Scan enables the government and security agencies to admonisher the entire population amounting to im prison people in a prison without walls. In comparison, it could be argued that Iris Scan could be considered as the best available database could be used fro criminal justice.It does not involve any physical touch for the obtaining of date and it could be taken without the consent of a person. Moreover, Iris Scan could be well used to obtain the try on even from an unwilling person without using force. III. Conclusion The technological advancements have helped the conduct of criminal justice faster, accurate and less procedurally complex. More than correctional measures, database could be used also for affirmative actions such as victim identification, welfare distribution, cheat prevention etc.However, it opens up new possibilities for abuse as well such as those by authoritarian regimes and commercial interests in monitoring the population. Reference Blitz, M. J. (2004). Video Surveillance and the Constitution of Public length Fitting the Fourth Amendment to a World That Tracks Image and Identity. Texas Law Review. 82 (6). pp. 1349-85 Komarinski, P. (2005) Automated Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS). Burlington. Elsevier Academic Press. Murphy, E. (2008). Paradigms of Restraint. Duke Law Journal. 57 (5). pp. 1321-45