Sociodemographic Characteristics of Community Colleg

Sociodemographic Characteristics of familiarity CollegThis chapter presents the results of the study. Included atomic number 18 an epitome of the five research read/write heads and the six hypotheses of the study. This chapter concludes with a summary of the learning presented in this chapter concerning the quantitative statistical findings of this study.As previously indicated, ruminate ecstasy is a term that is difficult to describe as a champion construct, and the definition of job satisfaction varies betwixt studies (Morice Murray, 2003 Protheroe, Lewis Paik, 2002 and Singer, 1995). In higher education, a number of researchers have discussed the importance of round-the-clock research on job satisfaction among community college competency (Bright, 2002 Green, 2000 McBride, Munday, Tunnell, 1992 Milosheff, 1990 Hutton Jobe, 1985 and Benoit Smith 1980). A reason suggested for the continuous study of community college faculty, is the value of data received from such s tudies in developing and improving community college faculty and their practices (Truell, Price, Joyner, 1998). The purpose of this study was to see to it job satisfaction of community college instructional faculty in regards to their constituent as teachers.Analysis of Research QuestionsResearch misgiving one dissever to describe the sociodemographic characteristics of community college instructional faculty. This research question included leash variables ( sexual practice, age, and race/ethnicity).Sociodemographic CharacteristicsGenderThere were 371 participants in the precedent, of which 188 were male and 183 were female. In regards to gender, the abbreviation showed that 51% of the essay coat included males and 49% of the sample size were female. confuse 1 identifies the absolute frequency and constituent results as they plug into to gender of community college faculty. evade 1.Gender Distribution of Community College Instructional facultyGender per centumfrequen cyMale51%188Female49%183 wide-cut ampere-second%371AgeThe sample size consisted of 371 participants. For age, the analysis displayed that 16% of the faculty were both under 30 and between ages 30 and 34 while17% were between ages 35 and 39. 15% of community college instructional faculty were between 40 and 44, while 14% were in the age range of 45 to 50. The last age range consisted of participants who were 50 or over, which was 21%. veritable(a) though the largest percentage of faculty members ar 50 or over, faculty members who are 34 or under total 32% which indicates that the mass of faculty are under the age of 34. dishearten 2 identifies the frequency and percentage results as they relate to the variable of age of community college faculty.Table 2.Age Distribution of Community College Instructional staffAgepctFrequencyUnder 3016%6030-3416%6035-3917%6540-4415%5745-4914%5150 and over21%79Total ascorbic acid%371Race and EthnicityThe sample size consisted of 371 participants. The variable race/ethnicity showed that 83% of the participants were White, Non-Hispanic 7% were Black, Non-Hispanics 3% were Asian, Non-Hispanics 1% were both American Indian, Non-Hispanics and Pacific Islanders Non-Hispanics 2% were More than one race, Non-Hispanic and 5% were Hispanics. Over 80% of the participants (308) were White, Non-Hispanic. Table 3 identifies the frequencies and percentages for the variable of race/ethnicity.Table 3.Race/Ethnicity of Community College Instructional mightRace/EthnicityPercentFrequencyWhite, Non-Hispanic83%308Black, Non-Hispanic7%25Asian, Non-Hispanic3%11American Indian, Non-Hispanic1%1Pacific Islanders, Non-Hispanic1%1More than one race, Non-Hispanic2%7Hispanics5%18Total100%371Research question two sort to describe the nature of employment characteristics of community college instructional faculty. This research question included three variables (rank, employment positioning, and incumbency status). temper of Employment CharacteristicsEmp loyment positionThere were 371 participants in the sample, of which 126 were employed good time and 245 were employed part time. In regards to employment status, the analysis showed that 34% of the sample size was employed full time and 66% of the sample size were employed part time. Table 4 identifies the frequency and percentage results as it relates to employment status of community college faculty.Table 4.Employment Status Distribution of Community College Instructional clevernessEmployment StatusPercentFrequencyFull time34%126Part time66%245Total100%371RankThe sample size consisted of 371 participants. In regards to rank, the analysis displayed that 9% of the sample size was set as professors. buster professors were set at 5% of the sample size while Assistant professors were identify at 4%. Instructors were identified as 45% of the participants and lecturers were identified at 2%. Faculty with other titles were identified at 30% and 5% of the participants answered the qu estion as not applicable. More than 40% of the participants (167) were identified as instructors. Table 5 identifies the frequency and percentage results as they relate to the be of community college faculty.Table 5.Rank Distribution of Community College Instructional FacultyRankPercentFrequencyProfessor9%30Associate professor5%19Assistant professor4%15Instructor45%167Lecturer2%7Other titles30%111Not applicable5%22Total100%371 promote StatusThe sample size consisted of 371 participants. In regards to tenure status, the analysis showed that 18% of the faculty were tenured 6% of faculty were on a tenure track, but are not tenured and 76% of faculty are not on a tenure track. More than 70% of the participants (282) were identified as faculty not on a tenure track. Table 6 identifies the frequency and percentage results as they relate to the tenure status of community college faculty.Table 6.Tenure Status of Community College Instructional FacultyTenure StatusPercentFrequencyTenured18% 67On tenure track, but not tenured6%22Not on tenure track76%282Total100%371Job Satisfaction of Community College Instructional FacultyResearch question three was designed to describe the job satisfaction of community college instructional faculty based on the eight components (Authority to make decisions Benefits Equipment/facilities Instructional bide Overall Salary Technology-based activities and Workload) of job satisfaction from the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty Survey NSOPF 04.The sample size consisted of 366 participants. In regards to job satisfaction, the analysis showed that 73% of the faculty were real contented with authority to make decision 34% of faculty were somewhat fulfill with benefits 44% of faculty were very(prenominal) comfortable with equipment and facilities 40% were somewhat meet with instructional support 55% were very satisfied with boilers suit job satisfaction 42% were somewhat satisfied with salary 53% were very satisfied with technolog y-based activities and 50% of faculty were very satisfied with workload. Table 6 identifies the frequency and percentage results as they relate to the job satisfaction of community college faculty.Table 7.Job Satisfaction of Community College Instructional FacultySatisfactionPercentFrequencyAuthority to play Decisions rattling satisfied73%268 middling satisfied22%81 sensibly dissatisfied4%14 very dissatisfied1%4Total100366Benefits actually satisfied27%106 more or less satisfied34%127 approximately dissatisfied19%70Very dissatisfied18%67Total100371Equipment/facilitiesVery satisfied44%161Somewhat satisfied38%140Somewhat dissatisfied14%51Very dissatisfied4%15Total100366Instructional supportVery satisfied37%134Somewhat satisfied40%147Somewhat dissatisfied17%62Very dissatisfied6%23Total100366Job overallVery satisfied55%203Somewhat satisfied38%141Somewhat dissatisfied6%22Very dissatisfied1%5Total100371SalaryVery satisfied29%106Somewhat satisfied42%157Somewhat dissatisfied18%67Very dissat isfied11%41Total100371Technology-based activitiesVery satisfied53%195Somewhat satisfied35%129Somewhat dissatisfied9%32Very dissatisfied3%10Total100366WorkloadVery satisfied50%187Somewhat satisfied34%127Somewhat dissatisfied11%41Very dissatisfied4%17Total100371Predictive Relationship between Sociodemographic Characteristics, temper of Employment Characteristics and Job SatisfactionResearch questions four and five examined the prognostic relationship between gender, nature of employment, (rank, employment s