Terrorism - Foreign Students do Not Threaten National Security :: September 11 Terrorism Essays

Foreign Students do Not Threaten subject area Security   In response to the horror of the September 11 terrorist attacks, the subjects has demanded action, and we choose gotten it. In addition to the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan and the ongoing federal investigation of the events surrounding the World Trade Center attacks, we put up seen a flurry of legislative and executive action designed to adjoin our domestic security. Yet not all of this activity has been without controversy. From Bushs executive aim authorizing the use of military tribunals to try non-U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism, to Attorney General crapper Ashcrofts call for the questioning of thousands of Middle Eastern men, government actions are sparking a crucial debate to what extent are we willing to sacrifice courtly liberties and individual rights in the quest to make our country safer?   For many students hither at the university, this question is not just a matter of compendium d ebate. Because several of the suspects in the September 11 attacks (as well as in the previous World Trade Center bombing) are thought to have entered the United States on student endorses, the relative freedom of international students to resume here may soon be restricted.   In the wake of the attacks, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) called for a six-month moratorium on student visas, a proposal that was subsequently dropped under unfluctuating pressure from representatives of U.S. universities. Yet the international student visa process stay under strict scrutiny.   The Visa Entry Reform Act, currently in the Senate Judiciary committee, proposes a number of measures to toughen up the immigration and visa system. Of particular interest are two components of the bill the implementation of a monitoring program for foreign students, and the denial of foreign student visas to nationals of demesne sponsors of international terrorism. The monitoring program would ensure that students pass a primer check before arrival, and are actually enrolled in a item program once they arrive. As such, it is a reasonable response to the accredited threat of terrorism which we confront. It is the second component to which I wish to object.   The countries which the State Department considers to be state sponsors of terrorism are Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Sudan. over the last four years, we have had hundreds  of students from these countries enrolled at the university.