John Stuart Mill’s Viewpoint on Interrogation and Torture Essay

In the world today on that point have been many controversial topics including topics much(prenominal) as euthanasia, the death penalty and brisk marriage. One that has always stood out in particular is the controversy over wring and interrogation techniques for terrorists in US keep . Ethic every(prenominal)y you offer argue for or a sack upst these twist and interrogation techniques but what would ass Stuart hoagys stall be on this highly debated topic? earlier we go into tin can Stuart Mills Utilitarianism Ethics it is dictatorial that we talk closely his background and when/where he lived to more accurately describe his mindset. John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher who was born in Pentonville, London, England in 1806 and died in France in 1973. John Stuart Mill was the eldest son of a sparing philosopher James Mill and had a actually rigorous upbringing shielded from peers from his feature age studying the ins and outs of philosophy. His fathers goal as a colleague of Jeremy Bentham was to create a genius discernment to carry on Utilitarianism after he and Bentham died. The intensive study his father target him through caused severe mental health issues on John Stuart Mill cause him to have a mental dislocation at age 20 which he claimed to be caused by the great forcible and mental demands that suppressed any feelings he should have developed in his former(a) childhood.John Stuart Mill as a Utilitarian philosopher, which is a form of teleological (goal based ethics) / consequentialism (moral worth of an action is persistent by its outcome), believed that ethical/moral decisions or actions should be made on the solid ground of the greatest good for the greatest number. That essence maximizing pleasure, satisfaction and well creation while minimizing negative affluences commonly referred to as ultimate importance. Utilitarianism can also be compared with deontological ethics, which do not take in the consequences of the ac count being a determination. John Stuart Mills rule Utilitarianism is much more relative then textual matter book Utilitarianism in which he support people to do acts that are acceptable to them as long as they do so to the higher(prenominal) pleasure. Although his comment of higher pleasure can be questioned as an absolutist since he is downright in what he defines as higher pleasure. Now begs the question what would his opinion be on enhanced interrogation techniques or torture on terrorists in US custody be? After the 9/11 attacks and the United States war on Iraq in the media non-stop over the last ten we here much of terrorists in US custody in places such as Guantanamo Bay being interrogated and tortured for information.It can be concluded from an Utilitarian rack that these individuals are less than one percent of the US & World population and if anything can be done to these individuals to pull ahead or cheer the rest it would be justifiable by any authori ty. Thus, it is pellucid that John Stuart Mill would whole-heartedly accept with these actions and more than likely encourage it. I consent with Utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill on the viewpoint of interrogating or torturing actual terrorists to protect United States soil but regrettably the term terrorist for the United States is loosely delimit and anyone disaccording with United States policies can be delineate one way or the former(a) as a terrorist. I disagree with Utilitarianism as a whole because thither is an obvious flaw with an individuals interest vs a greater correspond of lesser interests meaning that the legal carcass would punish behavior that harmed others but that would not punish in a berth where one can personally gain and no one would be harmed. in like manner one person could propose something would would maximize self-interest that conflict with means support by another. Thus, self interest causes them to agree with another to avoid interference th e means advised may accidently correspond with those by utilitarianism but the fundamental ethical imperative would not be utilitarian. Utilitarianism itself is somewhat a paradox when it comes to actual real liveliness use but sounds wonderful in theory if the world was really threatening and what / end all be all but of course as we admit it is not. John Stuart Mill would of course agree with enhanced interrogation techniques or torture but his utilitarianism justification would never be accepted by the United States masses.