Culture and Cognition Essay

polish whitethorn be defined as a combination of divers(prenominal) traits of a tender group. These traits or ways of life fecal matter be language, arts, sciences, thoughts, spirituality, brotherly activities, interactions, and many more(prenominal) (Definition, n. d. ). The world has many pluralitys and thusly many nicetys, thus each has their ingest beliefs, traditions, and customs. Another characteristic of a plastered last may be cognition. Because of gentle diversity in traditions and customs, there is as well diversity in information. fit in to Cole, Gay, Glick, and hasty (as cited in Sternberg, 2004), certain behaviors may be smart in 1 shade but plainly stupid in another (1971). agriculture and experience According to Robert Sternberg in his article entitled Culture and news program, tidings cannot be in full measured, developed, and conceptualized when it is outside the cultural context. This creates an impression that intelligence is a norm and ex istence a deviant from that norm would mean less(prenominal) intelligence (2004, p. 1). An ex axerophtholle hold backn by Sternberg about intelligence tests shows an evidence of his argument. both intelligence test created in wizard culture may not be valid in another culture. Sternberg in like manner constructed models in order to determine if the culture has a significant kernel on intelligence. On the third model, the dimensions of intelligence atomic number 18 the same as with the other models. However, the instruments utilize are different from the other models. The beat exercise was therefore derived from the culture being studied and not from outside it. As this is d hotshot, the psychological meanings of the scores of the assessments change from one culture to another. Culture and CognitionIntelligence is just one of the cognitive characteristics of man. Culture, as well as social systems has a role in developing the communitys system of thought. This is according t o Richard Nisbett, Incheol Choi, Laiping Peng, and genus Ara Norenzayan, when they studied the difference between atomic number 99erners and westerners in terms of cognitive processes (2001). They stated that east Asians are holistic in their cognitive processes, focusing on an entire domain of a function and its causality. On the other hand, westerners such as Americans are analytic because they pay more attention on the object and the categories, reservation use of rules such as lump logic.The authors of this article suggest that the origin of these differences is traceable to different social systems (p. 291). They were able to break up that there is still a rattling great difference between cultures. It is because of the pile brought about by these cultures that one process bequeath always be different from another. Furthermore, the norms or the normative standards for though will differ across cultures (p. 306). The influence of culture has many implications in cogniti on. This insight may change the very definition of intelligence as related to different social systems.This in addition has a great effect in cognitive assessment since one measuring tool may not be appropriate for all cultures. Although external communication is already established, this information would give more understanding to people as to how others with different cultures are different to them in terms of learning styles, perception, and other aspects of cognition. It would also change the perception on people who are considered as intellectually lacking(p) since intelligence no longer focuses on a dominant or normative standard set by those comprehend as superior.References Definition of Culture, (n. d. ). Roshan Culture Heritage Institute. Retrieved 24 May 2010 from http//www. roshan-institute. org/templates/organization/details. asp? id=39783&PID =474552. Nisbett, R. E. , Peng, K. , Choi, I. , & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and Systems of Thought Holistic versu s analytical Cognition. Psychological Review. 108(2), pp. 291-310. Sternberg, R. (2004). Culture and Intelligence. American Psychologist. 59(5), pp. 325- 338.